Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Zeh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1904No. Nos. 13,702 — (154)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Red Rake county, Watts, J., in favor of Anna W. Smith and James Bristol, intervenors.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action by a taxpayer of the city of Red Lake Falls to restrain and enjoin the auditor of Red Lake county from issuing warrants in payment of the interest due upon certain bonds, in which action Anna W. Smith and James Bristol intervened, claiming to be innocent purchasers of the bonds. The trial court ordered judgment for the intervenors, which was entered, and plaintiff appealed.

The facts are as follows: The village of Red Lake Falls was duly incorporated as a municipal corporation in 1881, under the provisions of chapter 40, p. 253, Sp. Laws of that year, and was reincorporated as a city…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Foster Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Supervisors v. SchenckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Daviess County v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Calhoun v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Culbertson v. City of FultonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barlow v. LonabaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. State v. Northwest Linseed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Corbet v. Town of RocksburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Rappaport v. Department of Public Health & HospitalsIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API