Rappaport v. Department of Public Health & Hospitals
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Emmert, J.
Our Constitution draws the line to provide a “government of laws and not of men,” 1 whether the men be in the executive department, or sit in the legislative department, or even sit upon the court with power to interpret the Constitution and declare laws of the General Assembly invalid. But when this court indulges in the field of constitution making by usurping the functions of the General Assembly which proposes constitutional amendments, and dispensing with the necessity of adoption by the people, under the guise of an interpretation unwarranted by the wording…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rappaport v. Department of Public Health & HospitalsIndiana Supreme Court · 1949