Legal Opinion
Supervisors v. Schenck
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 26, 1867PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
72 U.S. 772 (____)
5 Wall. 772
SUPERVISORS
v.
SCHENCK.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Cook, for the supervisors of the County of Marshall, plaintiff in error.
Mr. S.W. Fuller, contra.
2Opinion of the Court · CliffordJustice Clifford
Counties in the State of Illinois may purchase or subscribe for shares in the capital stock of any railroad company incorporated or organized under any law of the State, in any sum not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars.
Pursuant to that law the corporation defendants, on the twelfth day of September, 1856, issued, as alleged in the first count of the declaration, thirty bonds, each for one thousand dollars,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. JohnstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- Moran v. the Commissioners of Miami CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Stoney v. American Life InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
4Cited by76 opinions
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Grenada County Supervisors v. BrogdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State Ex Rel. Nuveen v. GreerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Hansen v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.