Legal Opinion

Antonio Roig Sucrs. S. en C. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 26, 1967No. C.D. 3175Published

1Opinion of the Court

FoRD, Judge:

Plaintiff by this action seeks a determination 'by this court of the proper classification of an article described on the invoice as a “Henderson 10 ton fixed electric tower crane with one spreader bar.” The collector of customs at San Juan, Puerto Pico, classified said crane under the provisions of paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739,1 as an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, other, and assessed duty thereon at 13% per centum ad…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Catton, Neill & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. TowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API