Legal Opinion

Otis Housing Ass'n v. Ha

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 31, 2007No. 25076-8-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Brown, J.

John and Min Ha leased the Otis Hotel to Otis Housing Association, Inc. (OHA), with an option to purchase and a mandatory arbitration clause. When OHA did not make their lease payments, the Has successfully sued for unlawful detainer. OHA then sought to arbitrate and filed a lis pendens. Deciding the option had expired, the court denied OHA’s application, canceled the lis pendens, and granted attorney fees. OHA appealed. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS ¶2 In 1997, OHA and the Has entered into an option to purchase, with OHA agreeing to purchase a Spokane property known as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Nordstrom Credit, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Estate of NiehenkeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Duprey v. DonahoeWashington Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Otis Housing Ass'n v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Otis Housing Ass'n, Inc. v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Shepler Construction, Inc. v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. OTIS HOUSING ASS'N, INC. v. HaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Otis Housing Ass'n v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API