Legal Opinion · Dissent

Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. Frazer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 17, 2012No. 0902947; A146596Published

1DissentWollheim, J.

The majority reverses the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order that held that claimant suffered a compensable injury when she slipped and fell on her knee during her morning break. The majority agrees with her employer, Enterprise Rent-A-Car, that the board erred in not considering the “going and coming” rule when the board held that claimant’s injury was “in the course of” claimant’s employment. For the reasons that follow, I respectfully dissent.

In order to give context to my dissent, it is necessary to dive into the murky sea of workers’ compensation jargon. This jargon has developed over…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API