Legal Opinion

State v. Teter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1988No. WD 38240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE

2Per curiam

Franklin Teter moves to recall the mandate and vacate the opinion in State v. Teter, 724 S.W.2d 538 (Mo.App.1986). He contends his counsel on appeal was ineffective in failing to brief and argue four points which would have produced a different result in the case. For the reasons hereafter stated, we find the claims to be without merit and therefore overrule the motion.

It is first appropriate to define the scope of review available in this post-conviction proceeding. Because an appellate court loses jurisdiction of a cause once the mandate issues to the trial court,…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Ralston v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Gundy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. GriddineMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API