Legal Opinion
Namekagon Hydro Company v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 29, 1954No. 11029PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Chief Judge.
This is a proceeding under Sec. 313 (b) of the Federal Power Act, 1 to review an order of the Federal Power Commission which denied the ’application of Namekagon Hydro Company for a license under the Federal Power Act to construct a dam and hydroelectric project on the Namekagon River in Washburn County, Wisconsin. The Commission found that “the proposed project is not best adapted for beneficial public uses of the Namekagon River, including the use of the stream for recreational purposes”.
Sec. 10(a) of the Act 2 provides: “All licenses issued under this Part shall be on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States Ex Rel. Chapman v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State of Wisconsin v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Wildlife Preserves, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- The Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Public Service Commission of the State of New York, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation Sun Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. General Crude Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. M.H. Marr, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. Continental Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation, Intervenors. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, v Federal Power Commission, Sun Oil Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.