Legal Opinion
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 29, 1965No. 106, Docket 29853PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge:
In this proceeding the petitioners are the Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, an unincorporated association consisting of a number of non-profit, conservationist organizations, and the Towns of Cortlandt, Putnam Valley and Yorktown. Petitioners ask us, pursuant to § 313(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U. S.C. § 825Z(b), to set aside three orders of the respondent, the Federal Power Commission:1(a) An order of March 9, 1965 granting a license to the intervener, the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., to construct a pumped storage hydroelectric project on the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Engel v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Nashville I-40 Steering Committee, Etc. v. Buford Ellington, GovernorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Road Review League, Town of Bedford v. BoydDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Bass v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Shaskan v. Waltham Industries Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.