Eastern Outfitting Co., Inc. v. Myers
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Daniel G. Deasy, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
This is an action in claim and delivery for certain furniture. The case was tried under an agreed statement of facts and judgment given against the three defendants, Myers, Goldstein, and Gray, for a return of the property or for the alternative sum of $750 in case delivery could not be made. Gray and Goldstein were sued by fictitious names under apt allegations in the complaint. The court made an order requiring an amendment of the complaint substituting other names for the fictitious names. The complaint seems not to have been formally amended, but Gray and Goldstein…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bayle-Lacoste & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Taylor v. BernheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Phillips Aviation Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.