Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. New Mexico Public Service Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1991No. 19046PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
In this “prudence case” we consider the second phase of a unified three-part process by which the New Mexico Public Service Commission (PSC or the Commission) considered the rate treatment of Public Service Company of New Mexico’s (PNM’s) 10.2% ownership interest in the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (Palo Verde).
In the preceding excess capacity case, 1 we held that:(1) PSC had jurisdiction to issue its final order both with respect to determination of alternatives to the inventory ratemaking methodology and to problems relating to phasing in of PNM’s excess…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- West 14th Street Commercial Corp. v. 5 West 14th Owners Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- PNM Gas Services v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Sandel v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.