Legal Opinion

State v. Binnette

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 21, 2004No. AC 24107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, George Binnette, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal violation of a protective order under General Statutes § 53a-223. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for criminal violation of a protective order, (2) the trial court denied him the right to due process by improperly instructing the jury, (3) the state denied him the rights to due process and a fair trial by engaging in prosecutorial misconduct and (4) the court denied him the right to effective assistance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. AnconaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. HasfalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. AlvarezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. State v. BinnetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API