State v. Binnette
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, George Binnette, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal violation of a protective order under General Statutes § 53a-223. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for criminal violation of a protective order, (2) the trial court denied him the right to due process by improperly instructing the jury, (3) the state denied him the rights to due process and a fair trial by engaging in prosecutorial misconduct and (4) the court denied him the right to effective assistance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. AnconaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. HasfalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. AlvarezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. BinnetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.