Legal Opinion

Automatic Voting MacHine Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen County

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

These two rules to show cause, made by a justice of this court, look toward a formal review of the action of the Bergen County Board of Freeholders in awarding a contract for a large number of voting machines to be used in Bergen county elections, to the defendant Shoup Corporation.

The claims of the prosecutors are fundamentally based on the proposition of law, that the contract must be awarded after competition to the lowest responsible bidder, and the proposition of fact (which is true) that this was not done. The Automatic Company holds a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holtz v. BabcockMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Peter's Garage, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  3. Schwartz Nagle, Etc. v. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Kingsley v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  5. SH Roemer Co. v. BD. OF FREEH'S OF CAMDEN CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API