Legal Opinion
In Re Adjustments to Franchise Fees
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 2000No. 25,893PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 P.3d 525 (2000)
129 N.M. 787
2000-NMSC-035
In the Matter of ADJUSTMENTS TO FRANCHISE FEES REQUIRED BY the ELECTRICAL UTILITY INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING ACT OF 1999.
County of Bernalillo, New Mexico, Appellant,
v.
New Mexico Public Regulation Commission, Appellee, and
El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Texas-New Mexico Power Company, New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers, Southwestern Public Service Company, and New Mexico Attorney General, Intervenors.
No. 25,893.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
November 15, 2000.
Sheehan, Sheehan & Stelzner, P.A., Timothy M. Sheehan, Kim A.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- El Paso Electric Co. v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- New Mexico State Board of Psychologist Examiners v. LandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Fernandez v. Espanola Public School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. NevarezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Alarcon v. Albuquerque Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.