Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. v. Farmer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chiee Justice Gkeen

delivered the opinion of the Conrt.

This is a suit by the bnyer, defanlting nnder a conditional sales contract, to recover from the seller that part of the consideration previously paid on the ground that the latter, having regained possession of a truck, did not observe statutory requirements in advertising and selling the same. There was a judgment for the plaintiff below, affirmed by the Court of Appeals, and we have granted a petition for certiorari.

The truck was bought August 11, 1936. There was a cash and trade in payment and twelve deferred monthly payments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murray v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Russell v. Clinton Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fry v. ShipleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lieberman v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Mitchell v. Automobile Sales Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nashville Auto Sales Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  2. Duplicator Supply Co. v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Tedesco v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Judd v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. In re Cherokee Asphalt Paving Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API