Legal Opinion

Saxman v. Christmann

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1938No. Civil No. 3967PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Originally this was an action to quiet title to mining claims, located on the Tonto National Forest Reserve created by proclamation of the President on February 10, 1909. The plaintiff, John Sax-man, as administrator of the estate of Charles Crismon, deceased, commenced the action. The defense to the action was that defendant Frida O. A. Christmann, individually and as executrix of the last will and testament of Walter Fred Christmann, deceased, had been given a “Special Use Permit” by the United States Forest Service to occupy and mine the ground plaintiff claimed. The defendant in her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Crismon v. ChristmannArizona Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Chantler v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Lee v. North Dakota Park ServiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McDonnell v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API