Legal Opinion

Wegner v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Plaintiff raises the question: Should there be a new trial in a civil action where there are communications between the bailiff and the jury, as in this case, while the jury is deliberating on the verdict?

The original order for judgment on the verdict was entered March 20, 1951. On the following day plaintiff moved for a new trial on the basis of an alleged affidavit by Henry Kronenwetter, one of the bailiffs, to the effect that while the jury was deliberating he was called by the jury to request of the judge that some additional testimony be read to it; that he communicated the request to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Barrock v. BarrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel. Gaudynski v. PrussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wiedenhaupt v. HoelzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. May v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. BurtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Anchor Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Oelke v. EarleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API