Legal Opinion

(PC) Kumar v. Saucedo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01772Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANJAY KUMAR, No. 2:24-cv-1772 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 J. SAUCEDO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (ECF 20 No. 13.) For the following reasons, this Court finds that the second amended complaint states 21 eleven potentially colorable claims for relief. This Court…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API