Legal Opinion

Maryland Pavement Co. v. Mahool

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Elliott, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This appeal is from an order of the Superior Court of Baltimore City refusing a mandamus and dismissing the petitioner’s application therefor. A statement of the facts will be necessary for an understanding of the case.

By Ordinance Ho. 258 of the Mayor and Oily Council of Baltimore, passed on the 9th day of April, 1907, the City Engineer was authorized and directed to have all that part of Monroe street from the southeast side of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad tracks to the northwest side of Columbia avenue graded and paved with belgian blocks and curbed or re-curbed where necessary with six…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Madison v. Harbor BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Baltimore, Canton & Point Breeze Railway Co. v. LatrobeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Devin v. BeltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Henkel v. MillardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Board of Education v. AllenderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Butler v. Printing CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Federico v. BrattenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Hylton v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API