Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baltimore, Canton & Point Breeze Railway Co. v. Latrobe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1895PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas (Phelps, J.), dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, J.

The Baltimore, Canton and Point Breeze Railway Company is a body corporate, and by ordinance number 50 of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, approved April the eighteenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-two, it was authorized to lay its tracks upon and along certain designated streets of Baltimore City. By the 12th section of the ordinance, the work was required to be commenced within six months from the approval of the ordinance, and to be completed within twelve months thereafter, “otherwise,” so the section declares, “the rights and privileges herein granted shall be null and void.” A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Legg v. Mayor of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1832
  3. People v. Broadway RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Hardcastle v. Maryland & Delaware RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  5. Hodges v. Baltimore Union Passenger Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Buchholtz v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Pressman v. ElginCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Upshur v. Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Westminster Water Co. v. Mayor of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API