Legal Opinion

Wigal v. City of Parkersburg

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Error to' Circuit Court, Wood County. Action by Amanda Wigal, -administratrix, etc., against the City of Parkersburg. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:

On the 19th of March, 1909, two large iron water tanks, sixty-five feet in diameter and forty feet high having a capacity of one million gallons each, constructed and main*27tained by the City of Parkersburg, burst and the water flowed •down tbe hill in such volume and with "such velocity as'to demolish a dwelling house and kill plaintiff’s intestate who occupied it. For its.alleged negligence in causing his death, his administratrix sued the city and recovered a judgment for $3000.00, and it has brought the case here on writ of error. A number of errors are assigned as cause for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Ritz v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mendel & Co. v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Searle v. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Weaver Mercantile Co. v. ThurmondWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Long v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lester v. RoseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Peneschi v. National Steel Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API