Legal Opinion

Agros Corp. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 11, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

I think that it is impossible to read the Suits in Admiralty Act (March 9, 1920) without concluding that Congress intended to provide for suits which are in the nature of in personam as well as in rem. In the' first place, although the statute is drawn by persons entirely familiar with the usages and terms of the admiralty, section 2 (Comp. St, Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1251%*), which confers the right, speaks, not of a libel in rem, which was the natural phrase if the respondent be right, but of “a proceeding in admiralty.” Whenever such a proceeding “could be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blamberg Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Middleton & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1921
  3. In re Locust Bldg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Markle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1925
  3. Western Lumber Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API