Agros Corp. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
I think that it is impossible to read the Suits in Admiralty Act (March 9, 1920) without concluding that Congress intended to provide for suits which are in the nature of in personam as well as in rem. In the' first place, although the statute is drawn by persons entirely familiar with the usages and terms of the admiralty, section 2 (Comp. St, Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1251%*), which confers the right, speaks, not of a libel in rem, which was the natural phrase if the respondent be right, but of “a proceeding in admiralty.” Whenever such a proceeding “could be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blamberg Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Middleton & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1921
- In re Locust Bldg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Markle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1925
- Western Lumber Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925