Western Lumber Mfg. Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
Those are 'suits in personam for failure to deliver cargo. The goods in each ease were delivered in San Francisco, for carriage by one or all of the respondents to a seaport on the Atlantic Coast. They were not delivered at their destination, but were in fact lost through an error of navigation upon the coast of Oregon.
The theory of libelants’ case is that the carriage which diverted the goods from their transit to the eastern coast was a deviation from the bills of lading, and in consequence that the parties to those instruments arc liable for breach of contract;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Rosenberg Bros. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1925
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- Markle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1925
- Agros Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Faigin v. KellyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- George Mark, D/B/A Mark Grain Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957