Hughes v. Eisner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjeiam.
The appellant, who was successful in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court in reversing a judgment of the Chancery Division of that court, appeals here under a claim of right. He voices dissatisfaction with the opinion of the Appellate Division. Appeals, however, are taken from judgments and not from opinions. He also argues strenuously that the denial of costs by the court below constitutes a violation of his constitutional rights. Under our rules costs are not a matter of right but are discretionary, Bule 1:4r-ll made applicable to the Appellate Division of the Superior…
2Cited by40 opinions
- Garden State Plaza Corp. v. SS Kresge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Amer. Trial Lawyers Assoc. v. NJ Supreme Ct.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Leeds v. Chase Manhattan BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- In Re Application of KershnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Giumarra v. Harrington HeightsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.