Wasson v. Wooten
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentMehaffy, J.
I do not agree, with the majority that the facts in this case do not establish a preference. The majority opinion correctly states the issue as follows: “The question now presented by the complaint is whether, in making distribution in the future, in order to prevent a preference, the Bank Commissioner should be required to distribute to the depositors who did not accept stock a sum equal to the amount of the exchange value of the stock accepted by the other depositors.”
The majority opinion states: “The general doctrine is well settled that preference in distributing trust property is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Portland Flour Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
- East Coast Lumber Co. v. Ellis-Young Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Baird v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Luikart v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.