Legal Opinion

Luikart v. Hunt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1933No. 28512PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

This is the first in a series of four similar cases argued the same day and involving preferences to favored depositors by an insolvent bank. From a judgment in this suit canceling the bank’s transfer and assignment of a note and mortgage to defendant, ordering them reconveyed to the receiver, and enjoining any other assignment or any attempt to collect them, defendant appeals. The decree awarded defendant the amount of the note and *643mortgage as a valid claim for a deposit entitled to share with all the other general depositors of the bank in the general assets thereof.

The transaction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spillman v. American Exchange BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Spillman v. South Fork State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hadlock, State Bank Com'r v. Callister.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dellamonica v. Lyon County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Baird v. ReinertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Crystal Bay Corp. v. SchmittNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dellamonica v. Lyon County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API