Benrus Watch Co. v. United States

DISSENTING OPINION

Bland, Judge:

I can not agree to the decision of the majority and will briefly assign reasons for such disagreement.

In the first place, I am not certain but that under the doctrine of entireties, the articles at bar are not watch movements. I recognize *144certain difficulties which, would follow holding these parts of watches to be watch movements under the doctrine of entireties, but, nevertheless, United States v. Schoverling, 146 U. S. 76, is no authority for holding that they are not entireties, because in that decision the court definitely pointed out that “It nowhere…