United States v. Hengerer Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
Watch movements having 16 jewels, adjusted, were assessed for duty by the collector at $4 each, and 45 per centum ad valorem as a “device or mechanism having an essential operating feature intended for measuring time” under paragraph 368 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The paragraph provides in part as follows:
Par. 368. Clocks and clock movements, including lever clock movements, and clockwork mechanisms, cased or uncased,.whether imported complete or in parts, and any device or mechanism having an essential operating feature intended for measuring time, distance, or fares, or the flowage of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Didisheim Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harry Wilson Sales Agency v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Benrus Watch Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Benrus Watch Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Sticht v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- United States v. Wittnauer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932