Tennessee Department of Human Services v. Vaughn
Tennessee Supreme Court
1DissentHarbison, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I do not think that the constitutional issue is properly before the Court in the first place, but if it is, then I think that it has been dealt with by the majority without proper analysis and upon unsound constitutional principles. My joining in the grant of certiorari was for wholly different reasons. I felt that important issues of procedure and practice were presented which had been dealt with insufficiently by the courts below.
I
This case involves an interlocutory appeal pursuant to T.C.A. § 27-305. The single question certified by the trial court for review is:
“Doe…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Tennessee Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. HughesTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Patrick v. DicksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- "Doe" v. "Roe"New York Family Court · 1963
- Hubbard v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.