Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tennessee Department of Human Services v. Vaughn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1980Published

1DissentHarbison, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I do not think that the constitutional issue is properly before the Court in the first place, but if it is, then I think that it has been dealt with by the majority without proper analysis and upon unsound constitutional principles. My joining in the grant of certiorari was for wholly different reasons. I felt that important issues of procedure and practice were presented which had been dealt with insufficiently by the courts below.

I

This case involves an interlocutory appeal pursuant to T.C.A. § 27-305. The single question certified by the trial court for review is:

“Doe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Tennessee Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. HughesTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Patrick v. DicksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. "Doe" v. "Roe"New York Family Court · 1963
  5. Hubbard v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API