Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Haynes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

The declaration in this case presents an action in damages for property damage to an automobile arising out of a collision which occurred on State Highway 11, between Chattanooga and Cleveland. After defendants had filed pleas to the declaration, they caused the Clerk to subpoena the plaintiff for the purpose of taking plaintiff’s deposition. Plaintiff, on advice of counsel, did not appear, and thereafter similar subpoenas were served from time to time- on plaintiff, until one which was served on July 11, 1949, requiring plaintiff to appear on July 20, 1949. The case came on for trial July…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co. v. FainTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. Nashville Baseball Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JenkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vythoulkas v. Vanderbilt University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Puckett v. BroomeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  3. United States v. Abraham MinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  4. Ahern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Kivett v. NevilsTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API