Legal Opinion

Durst v. Wareham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1931No. 29,841PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The action was brought against H. P. Wareham and the city of Manhattan to recover damages caused when the roof of a shed maintained by Wareham collapsed upon plaintiff, injuring him. Plaintiff recovered against both defendants, and both appealed.

Appellant Wareham owned the hotel in Manhattan. In the rear of this hotel is an alley. This alley runs east and west through the entire block. On the north side of this alley, directly opposite the rear of the hotel, Wareham has built and maintains a garage. Just east of the garage there is a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ParrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Ruocco v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Walmsley v. Rural Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Edgarton v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Applegate v. Home Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API