Legal Opinion

Louisville & N. R. v. United States Iron Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM LAWRENCE. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lawrence county. — W. S. Bearden, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The principal question presented on this record is in respect of the proper construction of a contract entered into between the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company and the United States Iron Company for the construction of a railroad known as the “Tennessee & Alabama Mineral Railway.”

It appears that in December, 1899, the iron company was the owner of certain mines and ore banks in Lawrence county, situated about eight miles from the Florence & Sheffield Division of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad company. The iron company was desirous of marketing its ore, and entered into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bradford v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Dyer County v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People Ex Rel. Keene v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. O'Bryan Bros. v. Glenn Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Turner v. ZagerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  2. Johnson v. CovingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 v. City of El PasoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1955
  4. Davis Holding Corporation v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Boddenhagen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API