Legal Opinion
Mulligan v. Oakes
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 9, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The finding of the commissioner discloses the following facts: The plaintiff was cook and her husband butler and chauffeur in the family of their employer, Mrs. Oakes, hereinafter referred to as the defendant. As a part of the contract of employment, it was agreed that the plaintiff and her husband, Joseph, should have Thursday afternoon off each week. On the days off, Joseph was allowed to use the automobile owned by the defendant or the one owned by her daughter, but such permissive use was not part of the contract of employment. October 6, 1938, was the afternoon off for Julia and Joseph.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Savage v. St. Aeden's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Taylor v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Ruckgaber v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Calway v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Davis v. Goldie Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.