Legal Opinion
Northeast Insurance v. Concord General Mutual Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 30, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODFREY, Justice.
On November 29, 1976, Gary Anderson was injured in an automobile accident. Appellant Concord General Mutual Insurance Company (“Concord”) had issued to Gary’s father, Charles Anderson, an insurance policy with uninsured motorist provisions that covered the injuries. The question presented by this appeal is whether the Concord policy was in force at the time of the accident.
Early in November, 1976, Charles owed Concord a premium of $11.69 for coverage from August 17,1976, to December 1, 1976. Concord sent Charles Anderson a letter warning him to pay the $11.69 premium by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Dill v. Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Fox v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Bruzas v. Peerless Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
- Rosen v. German Alliance InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meier v. New Jersey Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Copley v. Pekin Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Associated Builders, Inc. v. CogginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Kraul v. MAINE BONDING & CASUALTY COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Jerry v. CARBONE, INC. v. NORTH RIVER INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.