Legal Opinion
Rosario v. Natividad Medical Center
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 27, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01598Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LACHAURALEIGHN ROSARIO, Case No. 24-cv-01598-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. REMAND 10 NATIVIDAD MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 52 11 Defendants. 12 13 Following settlement with the defendant who removed this case to federal court, plaintiff 14 seeks a remand to state court. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the 15 motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the March 28, 2025 hearing. 16 For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Royal Canin U. S. A. v. WullschlegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.