Legal Opinion

Michael J. Conlon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2007No. 19-15783PublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Michael J. Conlon appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment against him under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. Conlon failed to respond to the government’s Request for Admissions within the thirty-day time frame set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a). Consequently, the United States by letter deemed its Request for Admissions admitted, and the government relied on those admissions when seeking summary judgment. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Conlon’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Carney v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Friedman v. Live Nation Merchandise, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Gwynn v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. SaeteurnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API