Legal Opinion

Dieker v. Case Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 14, 2002No. 86,429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

In this “battle of experts” revolving around the cause of a combine fire, defendant Case Corporation (Case) appeals the judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Douglas and Thomas Dieker, plaintiffs, on their claim Case breached the implied warranty of merchantability.

We reverse.

Plaintiffs purchased a Case combine from an independent dealer of Case products in the fall of 1998; a month later, the combine caught fire and burned while plaintiffs were harvesting soybeans. After the fire, plaintiffs found a trail of oil about a quarter of a mile long from where the combine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nunez v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Hurlbut v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Trimble, Administrator v. Coleman Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Casement v. GearhartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dieker v. Case Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State v. JamesMontana Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API