Dieker v. Case Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J.:
In this “battle of experts” revolving around the cause of a combine fire, defendant Case Corporation (Case) appeals the judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Douglas and Thomas Dieker, plaintiffs, on their claim Case breached the implied warranty of merchantability.
We reverse.
Plaintiffs purchased a Case combine from an independent dealer of Case products in the fall of 1998; a month later, the combine caught fire and burned while plaintiffs were harvesting soybeans. After the fire, plaintiffs found a trail of oil about a quarter of a mile long from where the combine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nunez v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Hurlbut v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Trimble, Administrator v. Coleman Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Casement v. GearhartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dieker v. Case Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. JamesMontana Supreme Court · 2022