Legal Opinion

Sarman v. Goldwater, Taber and Hill

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1964No. 4776PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

The guardian appeals from a final order entered in a guardianship matter. She had discharged her attorneys and substituted another. The order in question directed the requested substitution, fixed the fee due the displaced attorneys, and directed them to deliver their files and records to the guardian’s new counsel upon payment of the fee or giving appropriate security therefor. The substitution has been made. Three issues are raised on this appeal: Whether the guardian is personally liable to her displaced attorneys for professional services rendered; whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Morse v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gordon v. StewartNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Earl v. Las Vegas Auto Parts, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re Boyd's GuardianshipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Starks v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Argentena Consolidated Mining Co. v. StandishNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Harvey v. StreeterNevada Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API