Cutsinger v. Redfern
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
KIMBALL, Chief Justice.
| |This case involves an uninsured motorist carrier who seeks to enforce its policy language allowing it to reduce any amount payable under its uninsured motorist coverage by any amount paid to or on behalf of its injured insured pursuant to the workers’ compensation law. For the reasons that follow, we conclude the uninsured motorist carrier and the workers’ compensation insurer are solidary obligors such that payment by one solidary obligor extinguishes the obligation of the other solidary obligor to the extent of the payment. We further conclude the collateral source…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Cadwallader v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Bernard v. EllisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Eddie Hoffman v. 21st Century North America Insurance Company and Carolyn ElzySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Bilyeu v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Williams v. HardingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.