Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 2012No. 2011-CC-2377PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

hln this writ application, we are asked to determine whether Norell and Andrea Bernard (“Plaintiffs”), who were guest passengers in a vehicle owned and operated by Ann Bernard and insured by Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company (“Imperial”), are entitled to uninsured/un-derinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage under the Imperial policy. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Plaintiffs are liability insureds under the Imperial policy and therefore entitled to UM coverage. Thus, we affirm the rulings of the lower courts, denying Imperial’s motion for partial summary…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  5. Magnon v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  3. Weyerhaeuser v. Burlington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  4. Berthiaume v. GrosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Bilyeu v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API