Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Ferguson-Paulus Enterprises

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff bought a cherry pie from the defendant through a vending machine owned and maintained by the defendant. On biting into the pie one of plaintiff’s teeth was broken when it encountered a cherry pit. He brought this action to recover damages for the injury, alleging breach of warranty of fitness of the pie for human consumption. In a trial to the court without a jury the court found for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff assigns error to the court’s failure to sustain his objection to a general finding entered in favor of the defendant and to the court’s refusal to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Silva v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jim Dandy Fast Foods, Inc. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Finocchiaro v. Ward Baking CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. Kneibel v. RRM ENTERPRISESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Mexicali Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mexicali Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API