Hunt v. Ferguson-Paulus Enterprises
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The plaintiff bought a cherry pie from the defendant through a vending machine owned and maintained by the defendant. On biting into the pie one of plaintiff’s teeth was broken when it encountered a cherry pit. He brought this action to recover damages for the injury, alleging breach of warranty of fitness of the pie for human consumption. In a trial to the court without a jury the court found for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff assigns error to the court’s failure to sustain his objection to a general finding entered in favor of the defendant and to the court’s refusal to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Silva v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jim Dandy Fast Foods, Inc. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Finocchiaro v. Ward Baking CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- Kneibel v. RRM ENTERPRISESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Mexicali Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Mexicali Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992