Legal Opinion

United States v. Adams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 12, 1869PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from the .Court of Claims. The suit was founded on the petition of Adams, claiming .. a balance against the government on contracts with General Fremont, commanding' the Western Military District, for the construction of a certain number of mortar-boats and steam tug-boats, to be used' on the Western rivers in the late civil war.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the .Court of Claims. The suit was founded on the petition of Adams, claiming .. a balance against the government on contracts with General Fremont, commanding' the Western Military District, for the construction of a certain number of mortar-boats and steam tug-boats, to be used' on the Western rivers in the late civil war. The contracts were alleged to have been made on or about the 24th of August, 1861, for the. mortarboáts, at a cost of- $8250 each;" and' on or about the 10th of September following, for the steam tug-boats, at the cost of $2500 each. The petitioner wasi also…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

There has been a good deal of discussion between the learned counsel upon the questions, whether or not G-eneral Fremont possessed competent power, as commander of the military department, to make a valid contract with ’ the petitioner for the construction of the boats, in the absence of any authority from the Quartermaster-G-eneral or Secretary of War; and -if not, whether the delivery of the boats, acceptance by the secretary, and employment in the service of the government, did not operate as a ratification of the same? In the view the court have taken of the case, it- is not material how…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Tanner v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Northrop Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. SeawellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API