Legal Opinion
Kondo v. Katzenbach
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 13, 1966No. Nos. 19282-19284PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
I
Presented to us in these cases, consolidated for hearing, is a precise question: Did the District Court correctly dismiss the appellants’ complaints on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of the actions because the complaints were not filed within the 60-day limitation period prescribed by section 34(f) of the Trading with the Enemy Act (60 Stat. 925, 50 U.S.C. App. § 34(f)) ? (See Appendix A at 359-360.)
The three actions under review were filed in the District Court in May and July of 1964 and seek to set aside the dismissal by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- United States ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Honda v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.