Legal Opinion

Stott v. Greengos

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 20, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

95 N.J. Super. 96 (1967)

230 A.2d 154

MICHAEL STOTT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ARTHUR GREENGOS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 27, 1967.

Decided April 20, 1967.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.

Mr. Abraham Natovitz argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Frank J. Davies, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Davies & Davies, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by LEWIS, J.A.D.

In this suit plaintiff Michael Stott seeks to recover the difference between the price paid by his assignor, Eastman Dillon, Union Securities & Co.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Mahoney v. MinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. People v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Cammann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Durkee v. Illinois Cent. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RicheyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. New Century Financial Services Inc. v. OughlaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  3. DiJulio v. Digicon, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. Phoenix Associates v. Edgewater Pk. Sewer. Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. State v. VolpiniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API