Fisher v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s first amended answer. This motion presents a matter of first impression to this court. Plaintiff asserts that defendant does not have a reasonable basis to assert an offset of interest allegedly due, but not assessed, on *397the underlying tax item which is the subject of this tax refund ease. Defendant replies that the offset is reasonable and that this matter should be dealt with after the trial on the merits.1
Factual Background
On March 10,1994, defendant filed its first amended answer. In the answer,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sig and Barbara Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Samuel C. Dysart and Alma R. Dysart v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gisele C. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996