State v. Fulmer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, because there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction on the delivery charge. We affirm.
On April 6, 1989, uniformed officers in an unmarked police car saw defendant crossing a nearby intersection. Defendant had just noticed a marked patrol car go by, but had not yet seen the officers in the unmarked car. While looking over his shoulder, he reached into his jacket pocket and tossed a plastic bag onto the grass of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. Alvarez-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. SerbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.