Legal Opinion

State v. Fulmer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. C8907-33568; CA A64463PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, because there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction on the delivery charge. We affirm.

On April 6, 1989, uniformed officers in an unmarked police car saw defendant crossing a nearby intersection. Defendant had just noticed a marked patrol car go by, but had not yet seen the officers in the unmarked car. While looking over his shoulder, he reached into his jacket pocket and tossed a plastic bag onto the grass of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. Alvarez-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. SerbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API