Legal Opinion

State v. Pollock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 2003No. 0103-32263; A116427PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence. The trial court ruled that defendant’s offer to sell two women a controlled substance was insufficient to establish probable cause to believe that he attempted to transfer the controlled substance to them. We reverse and remand.

We state the facts consistently with the trial court’s written findings. On March 28, 2001, Officer Brian Hubbard was on patrol in Old Town in Portland. At approximately 1:00 a.m., Iran Johnson flagged Hubbard down. Johnson told him that “[a] gal at Fourth and Burnside was sick and had possibly been given…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. LichtyOregon Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alexis Martinez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Sandoval v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. State v. PollockOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. Marcus CrumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Leonel Sandoval v. Sally YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API