Legal Opinion

Hopfauf v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1998No. Civil 970223PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Randy Hopfauf appealed an order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

[¶ 2] After a jury trial, Hopfauf was convicted of theft of property. Hopfauf sought a new trial by filing an application for post-conviction relief. The State moved for dismissal of the application. The trial court summarily dismissed Hopfaufs application under N.D.C.C. 29-32.1-09.1 Hopfauf appealed, contending (1) the court erred in denying him an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, (2) the court erred in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RicehillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MehralianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. KunkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Steinbach v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Whiteman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API