Legal Opinion
State v. Kunkel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1985No. Cr. 1039PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Werner Kunkel appeals from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County deny ing his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
Kunkel was tried by a jury in the district court and found guilty of reckless endangerment. The relevant facts are recited in our earlier opinion in which we affirmed Kunkel’s conviction. State v. Kunkel, 338 N.W.2d 635 (N.D.1983).
On December 13, 1983, Kunkel filed with the district court, pursuant to Chapter 29-32, N.D.C.C., an application for post-conviction relief in which various issues of law and fact were raised. Following a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Henry SelvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Roy Garland v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. MickoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. EntziNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.