Legal Opinion

Ruderman v. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 22, 1962No. File No. 77476PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The first count of the complaint herein, as amended, alleges a cause of action against the manufacturer of a home permanent preparation. In language apparently inspired by the recent opinion in Hamon v. Digliani, 148 Conn. 710 (1961), the named plaintiff claims that in purchasing and using this product she relied upon representations and warranties made by the defendant through various advertising media. Her damages, she avers, spring from the falsity of those claims.

This demurrer asserts the failure of that count to allege that notice of the claimed breach of warranties was given to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. LaHue v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Welshausen v. Charles Parker Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of AmericaConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
  2. Benchmark Building v. United Builders Supp., No. 62896 (May 29, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API